The empire does not.
the question. Few can answer it.
Every organisation sits somewhere on this ladder. PRAETOR is built to move a cohort from wherever they start toward Level 5 across four days, one BlackBerry solution at a time.
never the wall.
Rome's legions held the borders. That was prevention — keeping the enemy out. It was not the Praetorian Guard's function, and history shows it was not where Rome's deepest vulnerability lived.
Rome's real exposure was the moment the top of the chain of command was destroyed. When Caligula was assassinated in 41 AD, the empire did not have a war on its borders — it had a leadership vacuum at the centre. No succession plan. No clarity on authority. The exact failure mode every modern board fears most: the person in charge is suddenly gone, mid-crisis, and no one is sure who decides next.
That is the function this programme is named for. Not a wall. A continuity-of-command discipline — the capability to keep an organisation operating, decision-making, and credible at the exact moment BSSN, OJK, Bank Indonesia, and the press are all calling at once.
Three BlackBerry solutions.
Every session builds toward one of seven elements — each issued with the specific BlackBerry solution that arms it in the field across Volume 1.
one BlackBerry solution.
PRAETOR maps Rome's actual military hierarchy onto the four-day journey. Each rank is earned, not awarded — and is conferred against one specific BlackBerry solution and specialization track.
Latin for the training period of a new recruit. Two days to govern the conversation and command the response — taking participants from Tiro to Optio, armed with SecuSUITE and AtHoc.
DAY 1 Threat literacy, resilience framing CylanceAI
DAY 1 Governance instrument, not IT tool BlackBerry SecuSUITE
The Counsel: "What the OJK examination actually asks about executive communications — and the personal liability most board members don't know they carry."
DAY 1 First entries in the Praetor's Ledger
The Counsel: Indonesian case studies — what happened in the hours after the PDN breach, and what should have happened.
DAY 2 Coordinated critical event management BlackBerry AtHoc
The Counsel: "What We Wished We Had Known: The 72 Hours That Determined Whether We Survived the Breach or Were Defined By It."
Drill objective: Faculty map each team's decision sequence against the AtHoc response model and OJK notification requirements; participants identify the exact point at which their real organisation would have failed.
KT Method: Situation Appraisal — separate concerns, prioritise, assign accountability under time pressure
Facilitator confers the rank of Optio on those ready to proceed.
Command at empire scale. From the device estate to the moment all three BlackBerry solutions are tested at once — and the certification that confirms it.
DAY 3 Personal liability, the device estate as evidence
DAY 3 Compliance instrument, not IT tool BlackBerry UEM
Drill objective: Every participant leaves having rehearsed an OJK examination and knowing precisely where their gap lies.
KT Method: Problem Analysis — isolate what is known from what is assumed before a regulator hears it
The Counsel: "The Legal Aftermath of a Device Breach Under UU PDP" and "How We Turned a Device Audit Finding Into a Board-Level Compliance Investment — The Numbers That Made the CFO Say Yes."
Drill objective: Faculty map the cohort's response against what a SecuSUITE + AtHoc + UEM-equipped organisation looks like under the same attack. The gap is visible and personal.
KT Method: All rational processes at once — the full PRAETOR discipline, tested across communications, response, and compliance simultaneously
SecuSUITEAtHocUEM
DAY 4 The Praefectus's working document, not a slide deck
"You came here to understand cybersecurity. You leave able to command resilience."
not found in a manual.
Eight named keynotes, practitioners, and panels across four days — drawn from people who have actually carried the liability, led the response, or sat across the table from an OJK examiner.
A senior governance & regulatory advisor on POJK 11/2022 board attestation. The personal liability most board members don't know they carry.
Prof. John R. Williams's keynote. "The breach doesn't destroy you. The 48 hours of silence afterward does."
A COO who led a live incident, speaking entirely from the governance seat. The decisions made before IT had answers.
Two serving CISOs, unscripted. What the absence of a tool like AtHoc actually costs in a real incident.
A technology & data privacy law partner. What the examination finds, what the prosecutor argues under UU PDP.
A Chief Compliance Officer on turning a device audit finding into board-level investment. The financial case, in Rupiah.
Dr. Abel Sanchez closes the series: what SecuSUITE, AtHoc, and UEM represent once the certificate is signed.
Prof. John Williams's closing charge, carrying the cohort from Day 1's exposure revelation to the Indonesia Cyber Adoption Decision. The thread beneath all eight Counsels.
is built once, in advance.
Three escalating simulations, each testing one BlackBerry solution under real governance pressure, building toward the moment all three solutions — and every layer of command — are tested at once.
Ransomware confirmed 07:30 on a Monday morning. The Corporate Crisis Committee must respond as faculty inject new information every 12 minutes: regulator call, press inquiry, second breach vector, key system offline. Tests whether AtHoc's coordinated-response model holds when pressure escalates in waves.
Each participant opens a sealed Regulatory Envelope describing real OJK findings — device management failures, breach notification gaps, DPO non-appointment — and is examined by faculty using actual 2024/2025 OJK transcript questions. Tests whether the device estate built on UEM actually survives scrutiny.
A simultaneous communications intercept, a multi-site ransomware deployment, and a device-borne data exfiltration hit at the same moment — with BSSN, OJK, Bank Indonesia, and media pressure injected in real time. Participants form the National Corporate Crisis Council, representing their organisations, with no single chair carrying the response alone. Ninety minutes, every layer tested at once.
can do on Day 4.
Not what they know. What they can do — in the boardroom, with their team, facing their regulator, with SecuSUITE, AtHoc, and UEM all under fire at once.
Map their organisation's executive communications exposure under POJK 11/2022. Identify what a regulator or competitor would find before they go looking.
Operate AtHoc's accountability layer under live pressure. Resolve authority before acting — and meet the 4-hour operational reality, not the 14-day window on paper.
Turn the device estate from a UU PDP liability into a UEM-managed compliance asset. Survive a live OJK examination rehearsal and know exactly where the gap is.
Command an integrated response across SecuSUITE, AtHoc, and UEM simultaneously. Present the Indonesia Cyber Adoption Decision in board-room format, with a 12-month rollout and a Rupiah investment case.
Leave with a completed Praetor's Ledger: Cyber Risk Workbook, Regulatory Envelope findings, the Indonesia Cyber Adoption Decision, and a Letter to their Future Self. A working board document, not a certificate of attendance.
Forty sessions, eight Counsels, three drills produce a specific confidence: the calm of having already commanded SecuSUITE, AtHoc, and UEM under real pressure — including the version where all three are tested at once.
not just to impress.
Four intensive days, each running from registration breakfast to evening close. Long enough for depth, short enough for sustained command attention. Each session ends with one clear artefact added to the Praetor's Ledger.
A personalised cyber resilience programme built across all four days: Cyber Risk Workbook, Regulatory Envelope findings, the Indonesia Cyber Adoption Decision, and a Letter to Future Self. Immediately deployable in the boardroom.
From Operation Amber Alert to The OJK Examination Room to the full-cohort Operation Black Shield finale. Each drill tests one BlackBerry solution; the finale tests all three at once.
Named keynotes, practitioners, and panels — a senior governance advisor, two CISOs, a law firm partner, a Chief Compliance Officer, and more. Field wisdom from people who have lived the breach.
Three further tracks await: Threat Defence Mastery (CylanceAI), Secure Digital Integration (BlackBerry Spark), and Innovation & Security Culture Leadership. Complete both volumes for the full BlackBerry CyberCommand Certificate of Comprehensive Competence.
command it — and certify it.
You leave able to command resilience.